EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/96.lightwave-0408/[e-mail] _Thu Apr 11 03:34:46 1996.msg

Internet Message Format | 1996-04-15 | 2KB

Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id DAA04406 for <[e-mail]>; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 03:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA278808083; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:34:43 -0700
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:34:43 -0700
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Originator: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
From: Bonfire <[e-mail]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Win 95 vs. Win NT
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:

At 11:29 AM 4/7/96 -0700, you wrote:

>I'd like to point out one major difference between Win95 and WinNT and
>that's the file system.  I was running Win95 while I waited for WinNT 3.51
>and the NewsHell.  I've got two hard drives, both SCSI based.  Both were
>formatted using FAT.  Under Win95 and VFAT, I couldn't believe the size of
>each cluster.  Even a 1K file would appear to use 4K or MUCH more.  With a
>lot of 3D object files and news group messages waiting to be archived, my
>1.8 GB drive would almost always sit below 900MB available with only 450MB
>actually being used.  Once NT 3.51 arrived, I converted the 1.8GB drive to
>NTFS and instantly got back 200MB due to NTFS's smaller cluster size.  To

Can Win95 read an NTFS format???

Bonfire